@deepfatesa lot of our current problems seem to be about the inherent lossiness of coordination. every person is a leaky abstraction and if you want to get anything done you have to go through a lot of people
@deepfatesI've been trying to see how DAOs will solve that. For a while I thought it would be like something you kind of joined forever, like a family. And they take care of you and keep you in new shoes for as long as you work for them
@tommy_minnetonkaone pet idea of mine is if big coordination problems were turned into fun simulation video games they could be mapped and experimented with, and that in some way is the only way fwd
@deepfatesbut now I see there are coordination problems with that as well. especially, the more invested you are in a organization, the easier it is to see other organizations as enemies. So I'm fascinated by the development of ragequit
@deepfatesI'm thinking now that DAOs are going to be more of a patchwork with lots of opportunities for egress. So Like people will be playing all kinds of different games and once you find one you like you can build a reputation in it
@holosmossyeah my take on shamanistic capitalism, is that some humans go full posthuman as a sacrifice to interface the AI world for their people, sorta like DAO directly hooked to your shaman/ that extends in overlapping circles of teams with relations to "demi-gods-friends they grew up with"
@deepfatesOlympus is cool. I don't understand there staking and liquidity set at all but I am told that it's all based on game theory where everybody will reach a Nash equilibrium which seems good
@tommy_minnetonkaone of the session 1 dao sources is rebel wisdom's video "humanity's phase shift" with daniel schmatchtenberger which was a huge red flag for sev reasons and i avoided, but now having explored some im rly enjoying said schmachtenberger's ideas
@murat>ens just had a DAO vote to transfer funds from list of multi-sig key holders to the DAO, which is basically the most major step for decentralizing respolsibility of spending DAO funds to collective voting within a deterministic smart contract
@murati highly doubt there will be anyone resisting the move, however it's interesting that even though a vote took place, there is no real world mechanism to guarantee the execution: the final outcome is still dependent on people cooperatinghowever after this step, spending funds should no longer rely on cooperation: the DAO will be able to trustlessly execute vote outcomes for the funds
@murat@tommy_minnetonka an example would be voting to change the fees required to register a domain, adjust grace periods when domains expire etc... good question tho hahah